|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The United States Declaration of Independence subverted the dominant social doctrine of the time, the Divine Right of Kings, by saying "All men are created equal"
See also: Christian Egalitarianism
Egalitarianism (derived from the French word égal, meaning "equal") has two distinct definitions in modern English.1 It is defined either as a political doctrine that holds that all people should be treated as equals and have the same political, economic, social, and civil rights2 or as a social philosophy advocating the removal of economic inequalities among people. In modern cultures, peoples tend to be divided into upper and lower classes. However, before the relatively recent agricultural revolution, humanity existed in primarily hunter-gatherer societies that, some believe, were at least largely egalitarian. It is considered by some to be the natural state of society.345 Social inequality has been shown to cause many social problems. A comprehensive study of major world economies revealed that homicide, infant mortality, obesity, teenage pregnancies, emotional depression and prison population all correlate with higher social inequality.6
FormsCommon forms of egalitarianism include economic egalitarianism, legal egalitarianism, luck egalitarianism, political egalitarianism, gender egalitarianism, racial equality, asset-based egalitarianism, and Christian egalitarianism. PoliticalThe framers of various modern governments made references to the Enlightenment principles of egalitarianism, "inalienable rights endowed by their Creator," in the moral principles by which they lived, and which formed the basis for their legacy. ChristianityMain article: Christian egalitarianism
The Christian egalitarian view holds that the Bible teaches the fundamental equality of women and men of all racial and ethnic mixes, all economic classes, and all age groups, based on the teachings and example of Jesus Christ and the overarching principles of scripture. Over the centuries Christianity has become much more respectful of women than were certain early Christian leaders coming after Jesus' earthly ministry. Literal readings of some Pauline passages prescribe women to keep silent in church and to be subject to their husbands. Christian egalitarians question the appropriateness of verbatim interpretations. Early Christian leader Tertullian referred to women as the "gateway to the devil." IslamAccording to Pulitzer Prize-winning authors Nicholas Kristof and Sheryl WuDunn,7 Islam is not misogynistic. Muhammad's introduction of Islam in the seventh century is seen by some as a step forward for women. Most Muslims worldwide do not believe in holding women back and systematically abusing them with honor killings and genital cutting. However, a very large proportion of the countries where women are subjected to such abuses are Muslim countries. Misogynists often quote Muhammad to justify oppression of and cruelty to women.7 PhilosophicalAt a cultural level, egalitarian theories have developed in sophistication and acceptance during the past two hundred years. Among the notable broadly egalitarian philosophies are socialism, communism, anarchism, left-libertarianism, and progressivism, all of which propound economic, political, and legal egalitarianism, respectively. Several egalitarian ideas enjoy wide support among intellectuals and in the general populations of many countries. Whether any of these ideas have been significantly implemented in practice, however, remains a controversial question. One argument is that liberalism provides democracy with the experience of civic reformism. Without it, democracy loses any tie - argumentative or practical - to a coherent design of public policy endeavoring to provide the resources for the realization of democratic citizenship. For instance, some argue that modern representative democracy is a realization of political egalitarianism, while others believe that, in reality, most political power still resides in the hands of a ruling class, rather than in the hands of the people.8 StudiesA study published in 2009 took into account data sets from major world economies and correlated them with inequality indices. The study found that the absolute wealth within a country had little effect on the citizens' wellbeing or social cohesion, and that inequality correlated strongly with social problems such as homicide, infant mortality, obesity, teenage pregnancies, emotional depression and prison population. For example, countries such as Sweden, Finland and Japan scored highly in social well-being and equality indices, while countries such as the United States and United Kingdom scored low in both.6 A study of American college students published in Nature showed that people are willing to pay to reduce inequality.9 When subjects were placed into groups and given random amounts of income, they spent their own money to reduce the incomes of the highest earners and increase the incomes of the lowest earners.1011 Critics argued that no experiments have been made on working adults whereupon they might not be generous with redistribution of their income. In a follow-up study, Swiss children showed a significant increase in sharing between the ages of 3 and 8. It has not been determined whether the results of either of these experiments are due to an innate instinct, or exposure to and adoption of the customs of other people.12 Support and criticismA society that meets the meritocratic goal of equal opportunity might still be a harsh environment for those who lack the physical, mental or social capabilities to compete. The extent to which a genuine meritocratic society is possible in the real world is debatable.13 See also
References
External links
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| kacelaria komornicza w warszawie - meble dla dzieci - meble sklepowe - fotograf lublin - piloty krajoznawcze |