WikiPortallus: Commonwealth realm.html

These countries have a combined area totalling 18.8 million km² (excluding Antarctic claims), and a combined population of 131 million^[2] The relationship of the realms to each other is analagous to a personal union and is sometimes referred to as such (that is, the realms, though completely sovereign, are united in that they share one monarch as their own).^[3] While the term Dominion has never been officially revoked, since the 1950s it has been replaced by use of the word realm in order to reflect the relationship of equality amongst all 16 countries.

Commonwealth realms are each members of, but distinguished from, the Commonwealth of Nations, which is an organisation of mostly former British colonies.^[1] Within the Commonwealth, there is no difference in status between the Commonwealth realms and other Commonwealth members.

Current Commonwealth realms

_{¹Year of Statute of Westminster enactment (Canada), adoption by realm (Australia and New Zealand), or grant of independence (all others except the UK).

²Adoption of Statute of Westminster was declared retroactive to 1939.

³Not applicable to the United Kingdom as it was the realm from which other realms have become independent.}

Relationship of the realms

The Commonwealth realms are sovereign states, united only in the voluntary and symmetric sharing of the institution of the monarchy,^[6] the succession, and the Queen herself; this means the Commonwealth realms are in personal union with one another.^[3] The United Kingdom no longer holds any legislative power over any country besides itself, although some countries continue to use the British Judicial Committee of the Privy Council as part of their judiciary.

The Crown in the Commonwealth realms

The personal union of these sovereign states has created the scenario wherein the Crown has both a separate and a shared character, being an institution that operates separately within the jurisdiction of each Commonwealth realm, with the Queen in right of each country being a distinct legal person, acting on the advice only of the government of that state. The Crown is thus unitary through its shared character, but divided in its jurisdictional operation, meaning that in different contexts, Crown may mean the Crown as shared or the Crown in each realm considered separately.

The monarchy is therefore no longer an exclusively British institution, although it may often be called British for historical reasons, for convenience, or for political (usually republican) purposes.^[7] One Canadian constitutional scholar, Dr. Richard Toporoski, stated on this: "I am perfectly prepared to concede, even happily affirm, that the British Crown no longer exists in Canada, but that is because legal reality indicates to me that in one sense, the British Crown no longer exists in Britain: the Crown transcends Britain just as much as it does Canada. One can therefore speak of 'the British Crown' or 'the Canadian Crown' or indeed the 'Barbadian' or 'Tuvaluan' Crown, but what one will mean by the term is the Crown acting or expressing itself within the context of that particular jurisdiction".^[8] Expressing this concept, through the proclamation of Elizabeth II's new titles in 1952, in each realm the Queen is known by the title appropriate for that realm; for example, in Barbados she is known as "Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, Queen of Barbados," or, simply, the Queen of Barbados.

As a consequence of this relationship, as per the preamble to the Statute of Westminster, any alterations to the line of succession to the throne must be approved by the parliaments of all the realms in order to guarantee continuity of a single monarch.^[9] For example, there have been suggestions of removing the religious requirements from the Act of Settlement, which currently defines the succession.^[10] In practice, since each realm is a sovereign state, this requires the voluntary cooperation of all 16 of the countries. Alternatively, a realm could choose to end its participation in the personal union.

In realms other than the United Kingdom, the Queen normally exercises only those powers related to her appointment of a Governor-General, usually on the advice of the prime minister of the realm concerned; in the Solomon Islands and Tuvalu the Prime Minister is required to consult the legislature in confidence; in Papua New Guinea the Governor-General is nominated to the Queen by parliamentary vote. In some realms certain other powers are reserved exclusively for her, such as the appointment of extra senators to the Canadian Senate, the creation of honours, or the issuance of letters patent. The monarch is also represented by a Governor in each state of Australia, by a Lieutenant Governor in each province of Canada, and by a Queen's Representative in the Cook Islands. In these cases, she is represented in her role as Queen in right of Australia, Canada, and New Zealand respectively. Within the United Kingdom, the Queen appoints Counsellors of State to perform her duties in her absence. These officials exercise almost all the powers of the constitutional monarch with mostly symbolic, figurehead duties, but they also have reserve powers, called the Royal Prerogative.

From a cultural standpoint, the shared nature of the Crown is less clear. In all realms, the sovereign's name and image continue to play a prominent role in political institutions and symbols. For example, her effigy usually appears on coins and banknotes,^{citation needed} and an oath of allegiance to the Queen is usually required from politicians, judges, and new citizens. Some argue, however, that the Crown within their particular country remains essentially British and primarily of the United Kingdom, whereas others emphasise the Crown as a shared link between the Commonwealth realms, with the Crown in right of their own nation as having specific domestic characteristics.

Monarch's role in the realms

Though the Queen's constitutional position is virtually identical in each realm, she lives in the United Kingdom. Consequently, the constitutional duties she personally exercises as Queen of the UK are in other realms generally performed by a Governor-General, who serves as her representative. The extent to which these duties are explicitly assigned to the Governor-General, rather than the Queen, varies from realm to realm, but the Queen does act personally in right of any of her other realms when required, for example when issuing Letters Patent, or on occasions of significant political importance. Similarly, the monarch usually performs ceremonial duties in the Commonwealth realms to mark historically significant events during visits at least once every five or six years, meaning she is present in a number of her realms outside the UK every other year, or on behalf of those realms abroad. She is also represented at various ceremonial events throughout all the realms by other members of the Royal Family, such as the Queen's children, grandchildren or cousin, who also reside in the United Kingdom, but act on behalf of the government of the particular realm they're in; meaning the Royal Family also has both a unitary and divided nature. The other realms may receive two to three such visits each year.

The personal union arrangement has led to situations where the monarch has a potential or actual conflict of interest. For example, Queen Elizabeth II, in 1984, while on a state visit to Jordan representing the United Kingdom, made a speech expressing opinions of the British government that did not reflect the view of her Australian government. This raised questions in Australia about the propriety of such an action,^[11] though the Queen was clearly not representing Australia at that time. Another documented situation was when Elizabeth II was in Latin America to promote British goods at the same time a Canadian ministerial trip to the same area was underway to promote Canadian products. The External Affairs Minister at the time, Mitchell Sharp, stated on the situation: "We couldn't ask Her Majesty to perform the function she was performing for Britain on that Latin American trip because the Queen is never recognized as Queen of Canada, except when she is in Canada."^[12] However, the Queen subsequently represented Canada abroad on a number of following occasions.^[13]^[14]

More serious potential conflicts of interest have arisen in connection with matters of war and peace. In 1939, South Africa and Canada declared war a few days after the UK did, so that George VI, as king of all three countries, was, for a few days, simultaneously at war and at peace with Germany. In South Africa the declaration of war had followed an initial declaration of neutrality which had precipitated a political crisis resulting in the replacement of the prime minister. Ireland (as the Irish Free State had renamed itself in 1937), which was arguably a Dominion until 1949, remained neutral throughout the war and the King had to validate the German consul's credentials. (No possibility of such a conflict of interest arose with Australia or New Zealand. The Australian Prime Minister, Robert Menzies stated that, as a result of the British declaration of war, Australia was also at war with Germany; New Zealand made a separate declaration of war which was timed to coincide with the British declaration.)

A more extreme example is the Indo-Pakistani War of 1947. George VI, as head of state of both warring nations, was, in a legal sense, at war with himself. In 1983, during the invasion of Grenada, Queen Elizabeth was the Queen of Grenada while it was being invaded by many other Caribbean countries of which she was also queen. Additionally, the invasion was also opposed by several other countries in which she was queen, notably the United Kingdom, Canada and Belize.

An important role of a governor-general is to act in such situations in a way that avoids placing the sovereign in such a conflict of interest. In practice, this may require a governor-general to take a controversial action entirely on his or her own initiative through the exercise of reserve powers. The Grenada invasion was formally initiated by an invitation for American forces to invade, issued by the Governor-General, Sir Paul Scoon; this action was deliberately undertaken without informing the Queen. Similarly, when Sir John Kerr dismissed the Australian government in 1975, he did not inform the Queen of his intent to do so. This was possible because the Australian constitution invests this power in the Governor-General, not the sovereign. The Governor-General may also have wished to avoid being dismissed by the Queen on the advice of the Australian Prime Minister.

Religious role of the monarch

In some realms, the Queen is the sovereign "by grace of God," and, in the United Kingdom, is the Supreme Governor of the Church of England. The coronation itself takes place within the context of a church service, at Westminster Abbey, imbued with theological, as well as constitutional, meaning. In some realms, the Queen retains the ancient title Fidei Defensor, a title first granted in 1521 by Pope Leo X to King Henry VIII, prior to the Reformation. Most other Commonwealth nations have removed those words from the Queen's title.^[15]

The Church of England remains the established church in England; archbishops and bishops are formally appointed by the British monarch and sit in the House of Lords as Lords Spiritual. In practice, the monarch delegates authority in the Church of England to the Archbishop of Canterbury. Certain churches (known as Royal Peculiars) have royal patronage, and are outside the normal diocesan administrative structures; the best-known example is Westminster Abbey. There are six royal chapels outside of the UK.

The role of the sovereign differs considerably in the other three Home Nations of the United Kingdom. In Scotland, the Church of Scotland, with a Presbyterian system of church government, is recognised in law as the "national church" in which the Queen is an ordinary member. [1] Her first act as monarch was to swear to uphold and protect the reformed church in Scotland; a similar oath for England had to wait for the coronation. The Queen has attended the annual General Assembly of the Church of Scotland on several occasions, most recently in 1977 and 2002, although, in most years, she appoints a Lord High Commissioner to represent her. Unusually for the Church of Scotland, Glasgow Cathedral and Dunblane Cathedral are both owned by the Crown. The Queen also appoints her own Chaplains from both the Church of England and the Church of Scotland.

In Wales, Northern Ireland, and the other realms, there is no official religion established by law. The Church in Wales and the Church of Ireland were both disestablished, in 1920 and 1871 respectively. Though Canadian coins are minted with the inscription D.G. Regina (Queen by the Grace of God) around her portrait, and her Canadian title includes the phrase "Defender of the Faith", Elizabeth II, as Queen of Canada, plays no religious role in the country.

Royal family

As with the sovereign, a single royal family is shared by the Commonwealth realms. Though there is no strict legal or formal definition of who is or is not a member of the Royal Family,^[16] the Royal Family is loosely defined as the extended family of the monarch. The group is most commonly referred to as the British Royal Family, for reasons historical, political, and of convenience. The casual use of this term, however, outside of the United Kingdom, can conflict with official national titles, such as in Canada.^[17]

The Queen and other members of the Royal Family regularly perform public duties in the sixteen realms. As the Crown within these countries is a legally separate entity, official activities of the Royal Family are funded in these countries individually, through the ordinary legislative budgeting process. Members of the Royal Family each engage in hundreds of public engagements yearly, as formally recorded in the Court Circular, to honour, encourage and learn about the achievements or endeavours of individuals, institutions and enterprises in a variety of areas of life. As representatives of the Queen, they often also join the nation in commemorating historical events, holidays, celebratory and tragic occurrences. They also sponsor or participate in numerous charitable, cultural and social activities. Their work draws public attention to amicable relations within and between the Commonwealth and other nations. Their presence, activities and traditional roles constitute the apex of a modern royal court. Throughout their lives they draw enormous media coverage in the form of photographic, written and televised commentary on their activities, family relationships, rites of passage, personalities, attire, behaviour, and public roles.

Flags

Flags of the Queen in Commonwealth realms

The Queen uses various royal standards depending on which realm she is in, or of which she is acting on behalf. She has standards for Australia, Canada, New Zealand, Jamaica, Barbados, and the United Kingdom. Each is a banner of the country's coat of arms with the Royal Cypher in the centre, and a crowned E for Elizabeth, save for the UK one, which does not have a cypher. She also has a personal flag as Head of the Commonwealth, which is used for general Commonwealth purposes, or when visiting Commonwealth countries of which she is not head of state. The Queen formerly had flags for Sierra Leone, Mauritius, Malta, and Trinidad and Tobago, but when these countries became republics they became obsolete.

Flags of Governors-General

Similarly, each of the Governors-General has a personal flag, all except two featuring a lion passant on top of a royal crown, with the name of the country written in capitals on a scroll underneath. The only two different are that of the Governor General of Canada (lion is not on a crown, but wearing one, and bears a maple leaf in one paw; the scroll is also absent from the Canadian design) and of the Governor General of New Zealand (featuring a royal crown on top of the coat of arms of New Zealand).

Historical development

Fourteen of the current Commonwealth realms, and all of the former realms, are former British colonies that have evolved into independent countries. The exceptions are the United Kingdom itself and Papua New Guinea, which was formed in 1975 as a union of the former German New Guinea – which had been administered by Australia as an international trusteeship before independence – and the former British New Guinea – which had legally been a British possession, though administered on the United Kingdom's behalf by Australia (as Papua) since 1905.

The possibility that a British colony might become a new kingdom was first mooted in the 1860s, when it was proposed that the newly confederated Canada might become known as the Kingdom of Canada. In the face of opposition from the Colonial Office, and the United States, however, the self-governing confederation created in 1867 became officially known as the Dominion of Canada. During the latter part of the 19th century, various other colonies achieved the same status as Canada, leading to Canadian Prime Minister Wilfrid Laurier insisting, at the Imperial Conference of 1907, on the need for a formula to differentiate between the crown colonies and the self-governing colonies. The term Dominion, which until this time had applied uniquely to Canada, was extended to cover all self-governing colonies, which then included Australia, New Zealand, Newfoundland, the Cape Colony, Natal, and Transvaal, and, in 1910, the three South African colonies merged with the Orange River Colony to form the Union of South Africa. In 1921, these Dominions were joined by the Irish Free State, which had unwillingly accepted Dominion status as a condition of concluding peace with the United Kingdom.

Although the Dominions were self-governing, their ability to legislate remained theoretically subject to British authority, and the monarch of the United Kingdom nominally reigned over these territories as a single imperial domain, with a governor-general representing the British government in each Dominion; the United Kingdom retained responsibility for the Dominions' foreign policy and defence. In practice, this unitary model continued to erode as the international role of the Dominions increased as a result of their participation and sacrifices in the First World War, which prompted Robert Borden, Prime Minister of Canada, and Jan Smuts, the South African Minister of Defence, to demand that the Dominions be given full recognition at the Versailles Conference, as "autonomous nations of an Imperial Commonwealth." As a result, the Dominions were separate signatories to the Treaty of Versailles, and obtained seats in the League of Nations, together with India. In 1920, Canada exchanged envoys with the United States of America, and, in 1923, it concluded a treaty in its own right: the Halibut Fisheries Treaty. In 1925, the Dominions refused to be bound by the British signature to the Treaty of Locarno.

The Balfour Declaration of 1926, embodying agreements reached at the 1926 Imperial Conference, formally recognised that, in practice, the Dominions had in recent years evolved into full sovereignty; it declaring that the Dominions were autonomous and equal in status to the United Kingdom. This had the result of each of the governments of the Dominions establishing a separate and direct relationship with the monarchy, the governor-general now acting as a personal representative of the sovereign in right of that Dominion only. The first legal enshinement of this new convention was the Royal and Parliamentary Titles Act of 1927 – which implicitly recognised the Irish Free State as separate from the United Kingdom, and the King as king of each Dominion rather than the British king in each Dominion – followed, in 1931, by the Statute of Westminster, through which Canada, the Union of South Africa, and the Irish Free State all immediately obtained legislative independence from the United Kingdom, while, in other Dominions, adoption of the statute was subject to ratification by the Dominion parliament; Australia and New Zealand did this in 1942 and 1947, respectively (Australia's ratification being back-dated to 1939). The statute also covered Newfoundland, but it was never ratified there, and the Dominion reverted to colonial status in 1934, eventually joining Canada in 1949.

There remained in the Statute of Westminster, however, the minor reservations of the right of the parliament in London to legislate for a Dominion by request, as well as the Judicial Committee of the British Privy Council as the last court of appeal for some Dominions. This left still vague the Dominions' status as independent nations; in 1940, P.E. Corbett, a Canadian lawyer, questioned whether or not any of the terms "federation, confederation, real union, personal union, suzerainty... vassalage, [or] protectorate" applied to any or all of the "possessions of the British Crown."^[18] Still others found the new arrangement to be detrimental to the unity of the Crown: Scottish constitutional lawyer Arthur Berriedale Keith warned that "the suggestion that the King can act directly on the advice of Dominion Ministers is a constitutional monstrosity, which would be fatal to the security of the position of the Crown."^[19] Indeed, between 1931 and the 1940s, there was confusion over how advice would be tendered to the sovereign: former [[Prime Minister of Australia] William Hughes theorised that the British Cabinet would tender formal advice, while the Dominion cabinets would provide informal direction.^[20] while the Irish government saw the relationship of these independent countries under the Crown as a personal union.^[21] By 1939, Prime Minister of Canada William Lyon Mackenzie King, in collaboration with then Governor General of Canada John Buchan, Baron Tweedsmuir, had King George VI appear in person in Canada to perform constitutional duties, and, with his consort, Elizabeth, travel to the United States specifically as King and Queen of Canada.^[22] The whole was affair meant to "translate the Statute of Westminster into the actualities of a tour," and, though Mackenzie King was ultimately successful, he met resistance from British authorities at many points, they believing that the British Ambassador to the United States should accopany the King to the United States, as opposed to the Canadian Prime Minister.^[23] It was the outbreak of the Second World War that affirmed the right of the Dominion cabinets to minister the King without interference from his British advisors; Canada and South Africa made separate proclamations of war against Germany in 1939, followed by Australia and New Zealand.^[24]

Although the Dominions were, by 1931, effectively independent kingdoms under a common monarch, and acted increasingly independently of the United Kingdom in the following years, their citizens retained a common citizenship, which was defined in terms of allegiance to the sovereign, without regard to the Dominion of residence. Although Canada (in 1921) and the Irish Free State (in 1935) had passed their own nationality legislation, this concept did not come into question until the Canadian Citizenship Act of 1946, which resulted in an agreement in 1947 that each Commonwealth member was free to pass their own citizenship legislation, so that their citizens only owed allegiance to the monarch in right of the country of citizenship.

The possibility that a colony might be granted independence without even remaining in the British Commonwealth was recognised for the first time in the Cripps Declaration of 1942, and the decisions by Burma and Ireland to become republics outside the Commonwealth in 1948 and 1949, respectively, were met with no opposition. At approximately the same time, India and Pakistan became independent Dominions, while Ceylon, which, as a crown colony, was originally promised "fully responsible status within the British Commonwealth of Nations," was formally granted independence as a Dominion to assure it of equal status with India and Pakistan. India, however, wished to become a republic and, unlike Burma and Ireland, remain in the Commonwealth, leading to the London Declaration of 1949, which established the formula by which republics could remain within the Commonwealth of Nations if they so chose. This process finally established the principle that former colonies, once granted independence, whether as republics or monarchies either in or out of persona union, were fully equal in status to each other and to the United Kingdom.

As these constitutional developments were taking place, the Dominion and British governments became increasingly concerned with how to represent the changes. At the 1948 Prime Ministers' Conference, the term Dominion was avoided in favour of Commonwealth country, and, at the same time, the term British Commonwealth was replaced by Commonwealth of Nations; in both cases to avoid the subordination implied by the older terms. The final step was the recognition of each Dominion under the Crown as a Commonwealth realm. This was initiated by the UK's proclamation of the accession of Elizabeth II in 1952, issued at St. James Palace, which declared her to be Queen "of this Realm, and of her other Realms and Territories". It also marked the first inclusion of the title Head of the Commonwealth, and the first reference to "representatives of other Members of the Commonwealth" as among those proclaiming. The Commonwealth prime ministers thereafter discussed the matter of the new monarch's title; Canada's then Prime Minister, Louis St. Laurent, stated at a prime ministers' meeting that it was important the new title format agreed upon would "emphasise the fact that the Queen is Queen of Canada, regardless of her sovereignty over ofther Commonwealth countries."^[25] In 1953, a new Royal Style and Titles Act was passed separately in each of the six Dominions then existing (except Pakistan), as well as the United Kingdom, which gave formal recognition to the separateness and the equality of the countries, and replaced the phrase British Dominions Beyond the Seas with Her Other Realms and Territories; the latter using the medieval French word realm (from royaume) in place of Dominion. Further, at her coronation, Elizabeth II's oath contained a provision requiring her to promise to govern according to the rules and customs of the realms, naming each one separately. At the time, it was argued that the whole point was to reflect the established fact that the Crown was now legally divisible and all the realms were legally equal in status. In the Commons debate, Patrick Gordon Walker stated: "We in this country have to abandon... any sense of property in the Crown. The Queen, now, clearly, explicitly and according to title, belongs equally to all her realms and to the Commonwealth as a whole".

The principle of fully separate and equal realms was followed in all future grants of independence. Other realms achieved independence through the winds of change that swept through Africa in the 1960s, the collapse of the Federation of the West Indies in 1961, or at later dates, the latest country to become a Commonwealth realm being Saint Kitts and Nevis, in 1983. When Papua New Guinea became independent of Australia in 1975, this was the first (and so far the last) time a Commonwealth realm was created from a territory that had never been made up of British colonies in its entirety. Most of these realms became independent with full constitutional autonomy, although in some cases certain links to the United Kingdom were voluntarily retained, such as the right of appeal to the Privy Council of the United Kingdom.

Former Commonwealth realms/Dominions

Immediately after their granting of independence from the United Kingdom, most Commonwealth countries opted to retain the same monarch as head of state, entering into personal union with the UK. Starting in the 1930s, however, Ireland, and then India in the late 1940s, agitated for a break from that relationship and the establishment of a republican form of government. Ireland created its office of president in 1937, but in doing so was not allowed to remain in the British Commonwealth. By 1950, however, India ended its status as a Dominion and became the first republic within the Commonwealth.

As the British Empire dissolved following the Second World War, most newly independent countries opted to retain the same monarch as head of state, though now distinctly as monarch of that country. However, a number of those that became Commonwealth realms drafted, within a few years, new constitutions, or amended existing ones, in order to become republics. This was especially true in post-colonial Africa, where leaders, during a time of strong anti-imperialist attitudes, preferred not to continue in a personal union relationship with other nations, opting instead to set up a resident head of state. However, these countries followed India's lead and remained members of the Commonwealth, recognising, as per the London Declaration, the British monarch as its head.

Some former colonies did not become Commonwealth realms because they became part of larger entities, rather than achieving independence. The mandate of Palestine was divided between Israel, Jordan, and Egypt in 1948. Newfoundland, although a Dominion covered by the Statute of Westminster, never ratified the statute; instead, it reverted to colonial status in 1934 and became a province of Canada in 1949. The British-administered, former Italian territories of Cyrenaica and Tripolitania merged with the French-administered Fezzan to form the kingdom of Libya in 1951. Eritrea, a former Italian colony administered by the United Kingdom after World War II, under the authority of the United Nations, was federated with Ethiopia in 1952. In 1961, Northern Cameroons was absorbed into Nigeria, and Southern Cameroons into Cameroon. In 1963, the crown colonies of Singapore, Sarawak and North Borneo joined Malaya (independent in 1957) to form Malaysia, which has its own monarchy. Hong Kong became a Special Administrative Region (SAR) of the People's Republic of China in 1997. And finally, some former colonies that are now independent countries were never Commonwealth realms because they were formed from a successor state, rather than achieving independence from Britain directly. Singapore, which was part of Malaysia until 1965, and Bangladesh, which was East Pakistan until 1971, fall into this category.

Two territories attempted to become Commonwealth realms, but failed. The first instance was when the white minority government of Rhodesia issued its unilateral Declaration of Independence in 1965, its members affirmed their loyalty to Elizabeth II as Queen of Rhodesia, a title to which she had not consented, did not accept, and was not recognised internationally. Her representative in the colony, Sir Humphrey Gibbs, immediately dismissed his Prime Minister, Ian Smith, but this action was ignored by Smith and he appointed, without the Queen's consent, an Officer Administrating the Government to perform the Governor's constitutional duties. In 1970, Smith's government declared Rhodesia a republic. The second example was when, in 1973, after mention of the United Kingdom was removed from Elizabeth II's titles in Australia, the government of the state of Queensland, concerned that this action was a first step towards declaring Australia to be a republic, sought to declare her Queen of Australia, Queensland and her Other Realms and Territories, in order to ensure that the monarchy would at least be entrenched in Queensland. The action was blocked by the High Court of Australia in the so-called Queen of Queensland case in 1974. While no other state has attempted to achieve status as a realm, the possibility was raised by both sides during the debate on the referendum of 1999 that a decision to make the country a republic might lead to the creation of separate monarchies in one or more of the individual states.

The former Commonwealth Dominions/realms, the periods in which they were Dominions/realms, and the reason(s) why they ceased to be Dominions/realms, are as follows:

_{¹Flags are those in use at the time the country was a Commonwealth realm. Ceylonese flag changed in 1951. Rhodesian flag changed in 1968.

²Now Sri Lanka.

³Now Zimbabwe. De facto realm but not de jure, mostly unrecognised internationally, and not a Commonwealth member. See discussion above.

⁴Now part of Tanzania.}

Commonwealth realm.html

Contents